coo.fieldofscience.comCatalogue of Organisms

↓ FS AbC CC CH CO / VL CW DM GMP GW HG MPM PX PY RRR SW TPP VM Home Angry by Choice Chinleana Doc Madhattan Games with Words Genomics, Medicine, and Pseudoscience History of Geology Moss Plants and More Pleiotropy Plektix RRResearch Skeptic Wonder The Culture of Chemistry The Curious Wavefunction The Phytophactor The View from a Microbiologist Variety of Life Field of Science Life. Distributed. 17 hours ago in The Curious Wavefunction Friday Fabulous Flower - pretty red 2 days ago in The Phytophactor Coriaria 3 days ago in Variety of Life Rove by the Riverside 3 days ago in Can we re-grow cartilage in damaged knees? A new Stanford study offers hope 1 week ago in Genomics, Medicine, and Pseudoscience Thinking about a post-pandemic world 1 month ago in RRResearch The action of UV-C against covid19 2 months ago in Doc Madhattan Daily routine 5 months ago in Angry by Choice The political brainwashing by the rich 6 months ago in Pleiotropy De La Beche's Awful Changes 6 months ago in History of Geology How do we mourn human civilization? 8 months ago in PLEKTIX Easter fires: Rainbow demonstration rises again 1 year ago in The Culture of Chemistry A New Placodont from the Late Triassic of China 1 year ago in Chinleana Posted: July 22, 2018 at 03:03PM 2 years ago in Field Notes Bryophyte Herbarium Survey 2 years ago in Moss Plants and More Harnessing innate immunity to cure HIV 4 years ago in Rule of 6ix WE MOVED! 4 years ago in Games with Words If You Are Against Nuclear Power 4 years ago in The Astronomist A New Wave of Science Blogging? 5 years ago in Labs Update: Tree of Eukaryotes (parasitology edition) 5 years ago in Skeptic Wonder post doc job opportunity on ribosome biochemistry! 5 years ago in Protein Evolution and Other Musings Growing the kidney: re-blogged from Science Bitez 5 years ago in The View from a Microbiologist Blogging Microbes- Communicating Microbiology to Netizens 5 years ago in Memoirs of a Defective Brain Out of Office 6 years ago in inkfish The Molecular Circus 7 years ago in A is for Aspirin The Lure of the Obscure? Guest Post by Frank Stahl 8 years ago in Sex, Genes & Evolution Girlybits 101, now with fewer scary parts! 8 years ago in C6-H12-O6 Lab Rat Moving House 9 years ago in Life of a Lab Rat Goodbye FoS, thanks for all the laughs 9 years ago in Disease Prone JAPAN'S RADIOACTIVE OCEAN | DEEP BLUE HOME 9 years ago in The Greenhouse Slideshow of NASA's Stardust-NExT Mission Comet Tempel 1 Flyby 9 years ago in The Large Picture Blog in The Biology Files Show 5 Show All An inordinate fondness for systematics Rove by the Riverside Email This BlogThis! Share to Twitter Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest By Christopher Taylor at 9/05/2020 10:22:00 am The Staphylinidae, commonly known as the rove beetles, are one of the most diverse of the recognised beetle families. Indeed, thanks to their habit in recent years of glomming up lineages previously treated as distinct families like the pselaphids and scydmaenids, they now rival the weevils of the Curculionidae for the position of largest of all recognised animal families. But for their diversity and ubiquity, staphylinids are comparatively poorly studied, owing to a not-unwarranted reputation for taxonomic recalcitrance (the relatively soft bodies of many staphylinids mean they often do not handle well with standard methods for examining beetles). Perhaps the most neglected of all staphylinid subgroups is the subfamily Aleocharinae. Aleocharines are often minute (the average aleocharine is only a couple of millimetres in length) and their identification often requires resolving features that lie at the very limit of what can be seen with a standard dissecting microscope. Nevertheless, aleocharines are remarkably diverse and among their representatives are the representatives of the genus Parocyusa . Parocyusa americana , from Brunke et al. (2012); scale bar = 1 mm. Typical aleocharines have what is thought of as the 'standard' body form for staphylinids, with short, square elytra that do not cover the long, flexible abdomen (though I should mention that, with the aforementioned assimilation of the pselaphids and scydmaenids, I suspect there may now be more 'non-standard' staphylinid species than 'standard' ones). For the most part, they can be distinguished from other staphylinid subfamilies by the position of the antennae, with their insertions placed behind the level of the front of the eyes. Aleocharines are divided between numerous tribes; Parocyusa is included in the tribe Oxypodini, a heterogenous group of relatively unspecialised aleocharines. Notable features distinguishing Parocyusa from other aleocharine genera include legs with five segments to each tarsus, a frontal suture between the antennal insertions, the median segments of the antennae being longer than wide, the head not having a well defined 'neck', the sides of the pronotum not being strongly deflexed downwards (so the hypomeron, the lateral section of the pronotum, is clearly visible in side view), and deep transverse impressions across the third to fifth abdominal tergite but not across the sixth tergite or across the sternites (Newton et al. 2001). Members of the genus are a bit over three millimetres in length. Species of Parocyusa are found widely in the Holarctic realm; I've found reference to species from Europe, Korea, and northeastern North America (I should also note that I've also encountered dark allusions to recent rearrangements of the genetic status of some of these species but without access to such revisions I'm going to stick with what I can find). I haven't found any reference to their specific diet but I suspect that they would be micropredators, a common lifestyle for staphylinids of their kind. Parocyusa species are associated with running water, living among the gravel and sand alongside stream beds (e.g. Brunke et al. 2012). As such, these and other aleocharines have received attention in ecological studies: the higher the diversity of staphylinids present, the more healthy the ecosystem is likely to be. REFERENCES Brunke, A. J., J. Klimaszewski, J.-A. Dorval, C. Bourdon, S. M. Paiero & S. A. Marshall. 2012. New species and distributional records of Aleocharinae (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae) from Ontario, Canada, with a checklist of recorded species. ZooKeys 186: 119–206. Newton, A. F., M. K. Thayer, J. S. Ashe & D. S. Chandler. 2001. Staphylinidae Latreille, 1802. In : Arnett, R. H., Jr & M. C. Thomas (eds) American Beetles vol. 1. Archostemata, Myxophaga, Adephaga, Polyphaga: Staphyliniformia pp. 272–418. CRC Press: Boca Raton. 0 Comments Links to this post Labels: Aleocharinae , Coleoptera , Holometabola , Staphylinidae , Staphylinoidea Caloppiidae Email This BlogThis! Share to Twitter Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest By Christopher Taylor at 8/27/2020 05:22:00 pm The concept of ranks in taxonomy is ultimately an arbitrary one. There is no real definition of what constitutes an 'order', a 'family' or a 'subfamily'. What determines the rank that a given taxon is recognised at is a combination of tradition, convenience, and the taxon's relationships to other recognised taxa. As such, the question of whether a given classification is overly 'split' or 'lumped' is a meaningless one and arguing the point is a complete waste of time. That said, the classification of the 'higher' oribatid mites is massively oversplit. A big part of the reason why oribatid classification seems such a mess, with large numbers of small families containing only a handful of genera and/or species apiece, can be attributed to simple ignorance. We simply do not have a good handle on how many oribatid taxa are related to each other and as a result we find ourselves with a great many orphan taxa still hunting for a good home. The Caloppiidae may be regarded as one such taxon. Dorsal view of Luissubiasia microporosa , from Ermilov (2016). Scale bar = 100 µm; labels with 'A' indicate areae porosae. C...